Friday, February 15, 2008

Michelle Malkin Could Remove Posts Calling For Your Death, She Just Doesn't Feel Like It

Now, as someone who used to do apocalypse forecasts and will do them in the future, it's tough to claim the moral high ground in certain situations. I mean, all doomsayers look alike to me. Still, and keeping in mind that I play the role of a terrible asshole on this blog and in life, some of the comments on Michelle Malkin's blog would be terrifying if they weren't so obviously the sad masturbation fantasies of the far Right.

On January 14th, 2008 at 11:45 am, granite said:

Unbelievably evil.

That’s the most accurate word for these two examples.

How much worse can these loons - socialists, perpetual adolescents, jihadi sympathizers, secularists, Communists, America-haters, Western civ-haters, _________ (insert your term here) - get, before the rest of us wake up and realize that they are shouting “fire” in a crowded theater; that they are screaming out fighting words.

Man, it looks as if these people are BEGGING for a hot civil war, not simply for a culture war.

Is evil or unbelievably the most accurate word? Because that's obviously not a typo where granite meant to say "words".

On January 14th, 2008 at 11:54 am, Boomer said:

In another thread someone mentioned liberal = an open mind. From what I have seen they are sick people with closed minds in desperate need of some counseling. I like many others believe liberalism is a mental disorder.

To add to granite’s fear of a hot civil war I have been reading my history on the last disagreement between the Southern states and the Federal government in the 1860s and I agree the country is just as divided as it was then. Only this time a civil war will not be about “states rights” but liberals vs. conservatives. I ask the hate filled liberals one little question. Who has the most guns, military training, obeys the rule of law (reason we haven’t risen up just yet), and has the will to use them?

Thank God Boomer is such a fantastic history scholar, because grammar sure as hell ain't his or her strong suit. I like many other who like ice cream. I, like many others, don't want a root canal. Do you understand the differences in those two sentences Boomer?

On January 14th, 2008 at 12:53 pm, Regulus said:

Who’s being sarcastic? When I say that liberalism is a mental disorder, I’m quite serious.

Although, in the interest of technical accuracy, “liberalism” itself isn’t the mental defect but rather a collection of symptoms and avoidance mechanisms that are indicative of the underlying disease.

If one surrenders oneself to Napoleon Hill’s “Seven Major Negative Emotions” - Anger, Hatred, Fear, Jealousy, Greed, Superstition and Revenge - the result is a malevolent inner ugliness seeking to express itself outwardly.

We all have these negative feelings to some degree; they are our “default set” of emotions, and unlike their seven positive counterparts require no conscious cultivation to take hold of the mind. The difference between a liberal and a well-adjusted person is that the latter confronts the negativity and seeks to overcome it, while the former tries to either deny its existence or to rationalize away its effects.

So much of what we see in liberal sociopathy - the projection, displacement, malignant narcissism and self-imposed alienation, the seething rage and hostility, the congenital dishonesty and paranoia - stems from their refusal to deal with the inner rot and decay that comes from wallowing in the Seven Major Negative Emotions.

“Liberalism is a mental disorder” isn’t a slogan, but a verifiable statement of hard fact. The two examples that are the subject of this thread are but more evidence of this truth.

I bet I can't find something that makes this self-righteous screed look silly.

On January 14th, 2008 at 2:16 pm, granite said:

#54 On January 14th, 2008 at 2:01 pm, genso said:

“…about confronting these folks?”

As I alluded to above (#8), we may be end up leaving the “cold” , nonshooting culture war and enter a hot civil war. That may be the only way for our culture to recover and survive.

It (the culture) has been perverted and devastated so by the socialists, leftists, Communists, hedonists, progressives (there’s a lie for you), self-haters (somebody stop me, please!), etc.; that reason and verbal, debate-type argumentative persuasion may be futile.

We cannot afford to meakly, effeminately end up like Europe; for that will seal our fate.

Whoops! Looks like I lose the bet!


On January 14th, 2008 at 4:50 pm, granite said:

Nope.

No satire.

Just sadness for the downward spiral of our culture and society, at the hands of folks to whom you sound similar - I may be wrong - but, to whom you sound similar.

And, sadness because a hot, shooting war may be the only way our nation, our society, our culture - not the sewer and madness into which we have descended these past 40 years - has a chance of surviving.

Never said the culture war should become a hot war.

But, if it comes to a hot war, it will be commenced with sadness and reluctance, yet with grim resolve.

Ultimatly, the basic, simple questions for us are how shall we live? What do we owe others? What do others owe us? How shall we govern ourselves? Who will control our children? Who will control us? With which worldview will our culture and society survive and thrive? Which worldview will destroy our society and culture, as is presently being allowed to occur?

So, please spare us what socialists, leftists, secularists, liberals, self-haters, etc. do when confronted and challenged; when their bullying is fought against; stop blaming those under attack for fighting back - although it is understandable that the one being fought back against would get enraged.

Why should we be expected to sit idly by when the greatest, best nation that ever existed continues to be dismantled and ruined piece by piece, slice by slice (salami tactics, after all)?

I'm starting the think granite is a twelve-year-old troll. What other person could have such a hard on for a war that a) isn't going to happen and b) would completely devastate the country? Also, salami tactics? Is this a real phrase?

That concludes our tour of Michelle Malkin's blog readers. Next time you hear someone who calls themselves a conservative but also hates John McCain, keep in mind there's a 42.64% chance that person is granite.

1 comment:

Apartment 618 said...

In the words of Stan Marsh...

"Dude, this is pretty fucked up right here."

A "hot war"...

?????

To think that people will soon break into fights at the polls, then take to sides between the left and right? What are they gonna do, pin in third parties or slaughter them? Where do the Libertarians go? Will the left kill them for their economic policies and the right kill them for their social positions? Will Obama and McCain fight this one out, with the Democratic Party divided into it's own war like China?

Why the hell did I even ask any of that? Just venting at ridiculousness here. Michelle Malkin has followed the Colter playbook and she's helping breed a set of hate filled jackoffs that think they run American. And those people have fans, like this guy, who take it all seriously and Doom the gene pool with stupidity because their long shot, blood lust-filled hope for Civil War has no chance of coming true.